Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Roux's avatar

Kudos to Jurij for not kowtowing to the all-mighty dollar (or Euro, in this case). Sangiovese can make some beautiful wine. My love of wine began while vacationing in the hills north of Florence in the tiny town of Gaiole and the Chianti Classico DOCG there was wonderful.

There will come a time where every wine tastes exactly the same (big alcoholic tannic monsters) - we are already edging up to that point - and the classic varietals will once again be appreciated for what they are. I am confident people will once again celebrate the differences if only because different wines pair with different foods.

Or we will keep making only California/Bourdeaux style reds and the only food it will pair with is steak. That would be a sad day.

Expand full comment
Dr. Christopher Colloca's avatar

What a great story underpinned by inspiring determination. I have another perspective (unpopular to the FLX wine scene). As a collector of red wines for over 30 years, I have a different thought about the world of reds. The difference is Sangiovese from Chianti is consistently good. Red wines from the FLX are consistently bad, IMHO. In fact, until 20 years ago I couldn't find a red wine made from FLX grapes anywhere worthy of a $25 price tag. Every FLX red wine tasted was austere, with the bitterness of the green bark of a tree branch that will bend and not break resulting from unripened fruit that should never have been destined for red wine in the first place. Put a FLX red up against an $8 store bought mass produced red from anywhere that has a climate that can grow reds and the supermarket wine wins every time. Any other winemaker from any other region would take their 18-19 brix reds and make a nice sparkling wine or rose' ... as has been done for centuries ... but NOT try and a red wine. But, in the FLX, many try and make reds from unripened fruit, which in my opinion, has a negative impact on the FLX brand. In fact, as you know regulations in several parts of the world even make it illegal for winemakers to make wine from varietals unapproved (and unproven).

There is a reason that Cab Sauv is grown in Bordeaux and not in Burgundy, and similarly, why the Germans focus on Riesling and not Grenache. We are also very good at growing apples and pears in upstate New York, but we don't grow avocados. So the move in the FLX to showcase Cabernet Franc is questionable in my mind. I believe we can ripen Pinot Noir more fully consistently than Cab Franc, and it would have received my vote as the wine to look to the future with. In the last 20 years, growers and winemakers like yourself, Bruce, Forge, Wiemer, and others have begun to make wines more to my liking. Sure, they are still convincingly 'cool climate' reds characterized by the freshness and acidity even with aging, but I think the growers are letting the fruit hang longer, allowing the fruit to ripen as it should and showcase the flavors that we expect from these noble grapes. I think there is a BIG difference between showcasing the nuances of FLX Cab Franc vs other parts of the world - just with one condition - with fully ripened fruit. Style differences from Terrior are fascinating.

The story that you shared is certainly testimony to the commitment to the grape, the culture, and to quality from the custodians of the land. Indeed you truly share these admirable traits and are making great quality Cab Franc in the FLX. Thank you, and sorry for the rant. :)

Expand full comment

No posts